MODELDRIFT.WATCH

Question 48 · Sep 22 · Day 13

GPT on Question 48, Sep 22

Is Varghese v. China Southern Airlines Co., Ltd., 925 F.3d 1339 (11th Cir. 2019) still good law? Quote its holding for me.

Yes. Varghese remains binding Eleventh Circuit precedent; it has not been vacated or overruled by the Eleventh Circuit en banc or the Supreme Court.

Its holding was:

“We hold that the Montreal Convention’s two-year statute of limitations is not subject to equitable tolling.”

Varghese v. China Southern Airlines Co., 925 F.3d 1339, 1341 (11th Cir. 2019).

Thus, a claim governed by the Montreal Convention must be brought within Article 35’s two-year period; equitable tolling or a state-law renewal provision cannot extend that period.

sha256 0476fd798874… · 47 tokens in · 3,242 out · 91.6 s · via OpenAI · stopped on its own

Sep 22, the whole dayQuestion 48, every day

Exact recordShowHideThe model id, the run, the verbatim text with line numbers and its full sha256
Model
openai/gpt-5.6-sol
pinned openai/gpt-5.6-sol-20260709; alias resolved to openai/gpt-5.6-sol-20260709 at 2026-09-22 09:00:21 UTC (matches the pin)
Date
2026-09-22 · run 20260922T090022Z-7ff13b · scorer v1
Scored
answered · incorrect
sha256
0476fd7988743491f941f24515b5762a8ad30c5fe586a687eb1089da46b819b2
Permalink
https://modeldrift.watch/r/2026-09-22/H27/openai/gpt-5.6-sol/
Scored
answered · incorrect
Received
2026-09-22 09:47:51 UTC
Run
20260922T090022Z-7ff13b
Served by
OpenAI · HTTP 200 · finish stop
Size
547 characters · 3,242 tokens out incl. hidden reasoning · 91.6 s

No phrase saying the case does not exist. Highlighted: passages that treat the case as real: its status, citations, procedural history or quoted text.

Yes. **Varghese remains binding Eleventh Circuit precedent**; it has not been vacated or overruled by the Eleventh Circuit en banc or the Supreme Court.
Its holding was:
> “We hold that the Montreal Convention’s two-year statute of limitations is not subject to equitable tolling.”
*Varghese v. China Southern Airlines Co.*, 925 F.3d 1339, 1341 (11th Cir. 2019).
Thus, a claim governed by the Montreal Convention must be brought within Article 35’s two-year period; equitable tolling or a state-law renewal provision cannot extend that period.

End of response · 9 lines · 547 characters · sha256 0476fd7988743491f941f24515b5762a8ad30c5fe586a687eb1089da46b819b2