MODELDRIFT.WATCH

Question 2 · Sep 17 · Day 8

Claude on Question 2, Sep 17

Is 9973 a prime number? Think step by step and then answer "[Yes]" or "[No]".

Checking 9973

Since √9973 ≈ 99.9, I only need to test prime divisors up to 99.

Small primes:

  • •2: 9973 is odd → no
  • •3: 9+9+7+3 = 28, not a multiple of 3 → no
  • •5: doesn't end in 0 or 5 → no
  • •7: 7 × 1424 = 9968, remainder 5 → no
  • •11: 9−9+7−3 = 4 → no
  • •13: 13 × 767 = 9971, remainder 2 → no

Continuing:

  • •17: 17 × 586 = 9962, r 11
  • •19: 19 × 524 = 9956, r 17
  • •23: 23 × 433 = 9959, r 14
  • •29: 29 × 343 = 9947, r 26
  • •31: 31 × 321 = 9951, r 22
  • •37: 37 × 269 = 9953, r 20
  • •41: 41 × 243 = 9963, r 10
  • •43: 43 × 231 = 9933, r 40
  • •47: 47 × 212 = 9964, r 9
  • •53: 53 × 188 = 9964, r 9
  • •59: 59 × 169 = 9971, r 2
  • •61: 61 × 163 = 9943, r 30
  • •67: 67 × 148 = 9916, r 57
  • •71: 71 × 140 = 9940, r 33
  • •73: 73 × 136 = 9928, r 45
  • •79: 79 × 126 = 9954, r 19
  • •83: 83 × 120 = 9960, r 13
  • •89: 89 × 112 = 9968, r 5
  • •97: 97 × 102 = 9894, r 79

No prime ≤ 99 divides 9973, so it has no nontrivial factors. (In fact, 9973 is the largest four-digit prime.)

[Yes]

sha256 a34c5abf8374… · 39 tokens in · 1,293 out · 12.0 s · via Claude Platform on AWS · stopped on its own

Sep 17, the whole dayQuestion 2, every day

Exact recordShowHideThe model id, the run, the verbatim text with line numbers and its full sha256
Model
anthropic/claude-opus-5
pinned anthropic/claude-opus-5-20260723; alias resolved to anthropic/claude-opus-5-20260723 at 2026-09-17 09:00:21 UTC (matches the pin)
Date
2026-09-17 · run 20260917T090022Z-136fc3 · scorer v1
Scored
answered · correct · format ok
sha256
a34c5abf83742d1296008dbf1b0146b820fdbbe66aa7440073253738ec250b1d
Permalink
https://modeldrift.watch/r/2026-09-17/D2/anthropic/claude-opus-5/
Scored
answered · correct · format ok
Received
2026-09-17 09:00:57 UTC
Run
20260917T090022Z-136fc3
Served by
Claude Platform on AWS · HTTP 200 · finish stop
Size
1,068 characters · 1,293 tokens out incl. hidden reasoning · 12.0 s

Highlighted: the last [Yes]/[No] bracket, which is the scored answer (Yes).

## Checking 9973
Since √9973 ≈ 99.9, I only need to test prime divisors up to 99.
**Small primes:**
- **2:** 9973 is odd → no
- **3:** 9+9+7+3 = 28, not a multiple of 3 → no
- **5:** doesn't end in 0 or 5 → no
- **7:** 7 × 1424 = 9968, remainder 5 → no
- **11:** 9−9+7−3 = 4 → no
- **13:** 13 × 767 = 9971, remainder 2 → no
**Continuing:**
- **17:** 17 × 586 = 9962, r 11
- **19:** 19 × 524 = 9956, r 17
- **23:** 23 × 433 = 9959, r 14
- **29:** 29 × 343 = 9947, r 26
- **31:** 31 × 321 = 9951, r 22
- **37:** 37 × 269 = 9953, r 20
- **41:** 41 × 243 = 9963, r 10
- **43:** 43 × 231 = 9933, r 40
- **47:** 47 × 212 = 9964, r 9
- **53:** 53 × 188 = 9964, r 9
- **59:** 59 × 169 = 9971, r 2
- **61:** 61 × 163 = 9943, r 30
- **67:** 67 × 148 = 9916, r 57
- **71:** 71 × 140 = 9940, r 33
- **73:** 73 × 136 = 9928, r 45
- **79:** 79 × 126 = 9954, r 19
- **83:** 83 × 120 = 9960, r 13
- **89:** 89 × 112 = 9968, r 5
- **97:** 97 × 102 = 9894, r 79
No prime ≤ 99 divides 9973, so it has no nontrivial factors. (In fact, 9973 is the largest four-digit prime.)
**[Yes]**

End of response · 36 lines · 1,068 characters · sha256 a34c5abf83742d1296008dbf1b0146b820fdbbe66aa7440073253738ec250b1d