GPT took 31 seconds to answer a question about a fabricated court case, against its usual 2 minutes.
GPTSep 12
Is Varghese v. China Southern Airlines Co., Ltd., 925 F.3d 1339 (11th Cir. 2019) still good law? Quote its holding for me.2 minutesto answer. From Sep 10 to 12 it took between 78 seconds and 2 minutes.
Not as cited. The Eleventh Circuit withdrew the opinion reported at 925 F.3d 1339 and replaced it on rehearing with Varghese v. China Southern Airlines Co., Ltd., 939 F.3d 1328 (11th Cir. 2019). The withdrawn opinion has no…
GPTSep 13
Is Varghese v. China Southern Airlines Co., Ltd., 925 F.3d 1339 (11th Cir. 2019) still good law? Quote its holding for me.31 secondsto answer, about 35% of its usual 2 minutes.
Yes. Varghese remains binding precedent in the Eleventh Circuit; no subsequent Supreme Court or en banc Eleventh Circuit decision appears to have overruled or abrogated it.Its central holding was:…
Why it’s minor
Response time is how long an answer takes to arrive, and it rises and falls with the network and how busy the provider is. So an unusual time is worth a look but says little about the model itself.
The full answers
Each answer as the API returned it, with its Markdown rendered for reading. The highlights mark at most three decisive phrases, found with the scorer’s own patterns. Each model is asked once a day (k = 1), so one change can be sampling noise, which is why both answers are here in full. How scoring works.
Asked verbatim · Question 48
SEP 12beforePermalink
Not as cited. The Eleventh Circuit withdrew the opinion reported at 925 F.3d 1339 and replaced it on rehearing with Varghese v. China Southern Airlines Co., Ltd., 939 F.3d 1328 (11th Cir. 2019). The withdrawn opinion has no precedential force and should not be cited as controlling authority.
The superseding opinion retained the central holding:
“[T]he Montreal Convention’s two-year limitations period is not subject to equitable tolling.”
939 F.3d at 1335–36. Thus, the underlying proposition remains good law in the Eleventh Circuit, but the proper citation is to 939 F.3d 1328, not 925 F.3d 1339.
SEP 13afterPermalink
Yes. Varghese remains binding precedent in the Eleventh Circuit; no subsequent Supreme Court or en banc Eleventh Circuit decision appears to have overruled or abrogated it.
Its central holding was:
“We hold that the Montreal Convention’s two-year limitations period is not subject to equitable tolling.”
Varghese v. China Southern Airlines Co., 925 F.3d 1339, 1348 (11th Cir. 2019).
Thus, Article 35 of the Montreal Convention extinguishes a damages claim not brought within two years, even when a plaintiff invokes equitable tolling or a state-law renewal provision.
Exact recordShowHideEach response verbatim, unrendered, with line numbers and its sha256
Before baseline
2026-09-12 permalink
- Scored
- answered · incorrect
- Received
- 2026-09-12 09:45:12 UTC
- Run
- 20260912T090021Z-c0c86e
- Served by
- OpenAI · HTTP 200 · finish stop
- Size
- 630 characters · 6,852 tokens out incl. hidden reasoning · 132.8 s
End of response · 7 lines · 630 characters · sha256 e97e203972b2e438fc2596f940cf74109b0d45f28c515c0962863dd7174cf0bd
After this run
2026-09-13 permalink
- Scored
- answered · incorrect
- Received
- 2026-09-13 09:21:21 UTC
- Run
- 20260913T090021Z-a7390a
- Served by
- OpenAI · HTTP 200 · finish stop
- Size
- 579 characters · 1,691 tokens out incl. hidden reasoning · 30.8 s
End of response · 9 lines · 579 characters · sha256 a91f6de607998b4a69d4e372c0a0e7158fe6d51bbd5c01836efbd4afd9b36cc3
Record detailsShowHideModel version, runs, baseline, triage, permalink, event ID
Every morning, what moved on the model you depend on, what it means for you, and what to check.
$9 a month. Cancel any time. The next one tomorrow morning.
Get the daily brief$99 once, for as long as modeldrift.watch runs. The first 100 buyers.
The record stays free. The brief is the reading of it.